This is the right way to conduct meetings. Later, those who were assigned action items are held accountable for achieving - or failing to achieve - their commitments on time. research into what has happened in the past) by all attendees.Дuring the meeting, each decision is accompanied by action items that specific attendees are asked to carry out, with agreed-upon deadlines. One universal example is meetings, which represent a colossal waste of time and money precisely because they're too focused on the present rather than on the past or the future.ДЄn effective meeting is by definition one with a clear agenda distributed in advance, which is used as a basis for preparation (i.e. The same phenomenon that degrades journalism also impairs business. The obsession with real-time data has turned us into a bunch of infants: If something isn't right in front of us right now, it doesn't exist. Now they just try to win the race to post news during the tiny window when it's relevant before everybody moves on to the next context-free, consequence-free story.

And they were also responsible for researching claims to provide context. Until the real-time obsession started dumbing us all down, reporters were held accountable for following up on the stories they wrote, especially those involving promises made by politicians. By ignoring the past and the future they mislead the public. If they cared about the future, they would find a way to follow up on the claims by setting a reminder to see if key publicly announced deadlines are met.Д«ut they care about only the present. If news media cared about the past, they would do some research and discover that such announcements in India never result in actual devices. The delivery of actual, cheap learning computers is taken as a given in these stories. Whenever the announcements happen, literally thousands of mainstream media outlets, from The New York Times to CNN and the BBC cover it with breathless reports.

Every year or two, some high-ranking minister in India announces a 'breakthrough' that will result in millions of Indian school kids being given $10 laptops, $35 tablets or something like that. My favorite example is the recurring cheap Indian laptop or tablet story. And second, hardly anyone follows up on whether these speculative or provisional events ever take place in real life. Two problems: First, there's often little research to place news in context - to find out if the idea is really new, or just a new spin on very old news.

Mail client setup for gaggle account